<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: DISTRIBUTION AND CONSUMPTION IN 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?feed=rss2&#038;p=749" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749</link>
	<description>For artists and art lovers who are drawn to the edge.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:48:46 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Lighten up indie film kids! &#171; Dave&#8217;s screen and sound playground!</title>
		<link>http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749&#038;cpage=1#comment-130</link>
		<dc:creator>Lighten up indie film kids! &#171; Dave&#8217;s screen and sound playground!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 00:04:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749#comment-130</guid>
		<description>[...] fact, look at what the future could hold! We are in an absolutely prime spot to beat the big guys on a lot of these distribution fronts. Be [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] fact, look at what the future could hold! We are in an absolutely prime spot to beat the big guys on a lot of these distribution fronts. Be [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Chapnick</title>
		<link>http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749&#038;cpage=1#comment-121</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Chapnick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 08:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749#comment-121</guid>
		<description>Hey Roger!

I bought me a Roku player and I LOVE it.  For me it was the price point ($99) and the fact that I&#039;m no longer a gamer, since owning the ill-fated Atari 5200 in 1985...

  I think you&#039;re spot on in pointing out that the no-risk/no extra money to shell out per film scenario is the golden ticket for consumers, psychologically.  I predict that simply Netflix&#039;s monthly subscription model, plus the sub $100 device price, will, more than anything else, make them the service to beat.  As long as they keep ramping up the Download Instantly library!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey Roger!</p>
<p>I bought me a Roku player and I LOVE it.  For me it was the price point ($99) and the fact that I&#8217;m no longer a gamer, since owning the ill-fated Atari 5200 in 1985&#8230;</p>
<p>  I think you&#8217;re spot on in pointing out that the no-risk/no extra money to shell out per film scenario is the golden ticket for consumers, psychologically.  I predict that simply Netflix&#8217;s monthly subscription model, plus the sub $100 device price, will, more than anything else, make them the service to beat.  As long as they keep ramping up the Download Instantly library!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jarrod Whaley</title>
		<link>http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749&#038;cpage=1#comment-119</link>
		<dc:creator>Jarrod Whaley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:05:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749#comment-119</guid>
		<description>Mr. Tinch, I have quite a bit to say in response to your article. Rather than say it all here, I have posted my comments to be own blog at the URL given below. I invite responses from either you or your readers, either here or in the comments section on my own post.

http://www.oakstreetfilms.com/2008/12/19/the-present-is-not-the-future/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mr. Tinch, I have quite a bit to say in response to your article. Rather than say it all here, I have posted my comments to be own blog at the URL given below. I invite responses from either you or your readers, either here or in the comments section on my own post.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.oakstreetfilms.com/2008/12/19/the-present-is-not-the-future/" rel="nofollow">http://www.oakstreetfilms.com/2008/12/19/the-present-is-not-the-future/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Present Is Not The Future - Oak Street Films</title>
		<link>http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749&#038;cpage=1#comment-118</link>
		<dc:creator>The Present Is Not The Future - Oak Street Films</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Dec 2008 06:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749#comment-118</guid>
		<description>[...] familiar and oddly comforting. Take, for example, Roger Erik Tinch&#8217;s take on cinematic &#8220;Distribution and Consumption in 2009,&#8221; a particularly illustrative instance of the phenomenon. Tinch presents the observable fact [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] familiar and oddly comforting. Take, for example, Roger Erik Tinch&#8217;s take on cinematic &#8220;Distribution and Consumption in 2009,&#8221; a particularly illustrative instance of the phenomenon. Tinch presents the observable fact [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: christopher</title>
		<link>http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749&#038;cpage=1#comment-117</link>
		<dc:creator>christopher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 23:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.cinevegas.com/blog/?p=749#comment-117</guid>
		<description>&quot;Online video is strong in rental, but I don’t know many people who have bought-to own digital films. There’s something very satisfying about owning a tangible version of your favorite movie.&quot;

i agree that ownership will still be important - but i think only to a small percentage of the population.  i know i&#039;m already unusual in that i rarely buy movies (most that i have were given to me as gifts), but i don&#039;t think i&#039;m unusual in hardly ever watching the ones i own.  

so i think when the great online library of all content is instantly and easily accessible for next to or nothing via your widescreen tv, ownership will essentially be meaningless.  i wouldn&#039;t buy even my favorite films if i could simply sit down in front of my tv and call it up - and then when i&#039;d watched my favorite scene, jump off to some ancillary material or seamlessly transition to a site with analysis or into the game version.

that world will be here sooner than we think and it will decimate plastic ownership of titles.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Online video is strong in rental, but I don’t know many people who have bought-to own digital films. There’s something very satisfying about owning a tangible version of your favorite movie.&#8221;</p>
<p>i agree that ownership will still be important &#8211; but i think only to a small percentage of the population.  i know i&#8217;m already unusual in that i rarely buy movies (most that i have were given to me as gifts), but i don&#8217;t think i&#8217;m unusual in hardly ever watching the ones i own.  </p>
<p>so i think when the great online library of all content is instantly and easily accessible for next to or nothing via your widescreen tv, ownership will essentially be meaningless.  i wouldn&#8217;t buy even my favorite films if i could simply sit down in front of my tv and call it up &#8211; and then when i&#8217;d watched my favorite scene, jump off to some ancillary material or seamlessly transition to a site with analysis or into the game version.</p>
<p>that world will be here sooner than we think and it will decimate plastic ownership of titles.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
